Are We Living in a Simulation? New Gravity Theory Suggests the Universe Might Be a Giant Computer

Redaksi Selasa, April 29, 2025 Comment

Are We Living in a Simulation? New Gravity Theory Suggests the Universe Might Be a Giant Computer.

Have you ever felt like life is just a movie, or maybe even a video game running on some mysterious system? Turns out, you're not the only one. A physics professor from the University of Portsmouth in the UK, Dr. Melvin Vopson, recently made a bold claim: gravity might be proof that we’re actually living inside a computer simulation.

Yes, you read that right. The force that keeps your feet on the ground and makes planets orbit the sun — gravity — might not be just a law of nature. According to Vopson, it could be part of a giant information system designed to optimize how the universe works, just like how computer programs are built for efficiency.

What Does “Living in a Simulation” Even Mean?

The idea that we might be living in a simulation isn’t exactly new. It’s been debated for years by scientists, philosophers, and yes, even sci-fi fans and conspiracy theorists. But as technology advances, this theory is gaining more attention.

In simple terms, the simulation hypothesis suggests that our reality — everything from stars in the sky to your morning coffee — is not truly real, but rather a super-advanced computer program running somewhere out there. Kind of like being characters in the most realistic video game ever made.

So What’s Gravity Got to Do with It?

Here’s where it gets interesting. Dr. Vopson argues that gravity might be a tool used by the simulation to save computing power. Think of it like this: when multiple objects are pulled together (like planets forming a solar system), it actually becomes easier to process and describe the system as a whole, rather than tracking billions of scattered pieces individually.

From a simulation standpoint, grouping things together via gravity reduces the amount of data the system has to handle. It’s a bit like how your computer runs faster when it has fewer open tabs — it's all about efficiency.

Rewriting Gravity Through the Lens of Information Theory

Dr. Vopson doesn’t stop there. In his latest paper, he rethinks Newton’s law of universal gravitation, not through classical physics, but using information theory — specifically the idea of informational entropy.

Now, entropy in physics usually refers to disorder in a system. Over time, physical entropy tends to increase, which is why systems eventually fall apart (think melting ice, rusting metal, or the eventual heat death of the universe). But Vopson flips that idea on its head.

He introduces what he calls a “second law of infodynamics,” suggesting that informational entropy tends to decrease over time in a simulation. In other words, simulated systems might naturally evolve toward being more organized, not more chaotic — because that’s what’s more efficient for computing.

From this view, gravity isn’t just a force; it's a mechanism that helps the simulation stay neat and efficient.

A Radical Idea, But Not Without Critics

Of course, a theory like this doesn’t come without controversy. Many scientists are skeptical. Critics argue that while the simulation hypothesis is intriguing, it often lacks solid proof and dives too deep into philosophy rather than testable science.

Still, even skeptics admit: if we really were living in a simulation, we might never be able to prove it — or escape it. If the whole universe is part of the program, then every test, every experiment, and every observation is just happening inside the system itself.

In a way, it’s like trying to figure out the outside world while stuck inside a video game. You can guess all you want, but you might never be able to reach outside the code.

Not Vopson’s First Wild Idea

This isn’t Dr. Vopson’s first time stirring things up. In an earlier paper, he analyzed how viruses like SARS-CoV-2 evolve and claimed that the patterns in their mutations looked like they were coming from a programmed system rather than random natural processes.

Yep — he basically said viruses might show signs of artificial design. Naturally, that got attention (and criticism), but it also added fuel to the simulation theory discussion.

So... Are We in a Simulation or Not?

Honestly, we still don’t know. And we might never find out. But theories like this one challenge us to think differently about the universe.

What if gravity, time, space — even our own thoughts — are all part of a digital framework built for efficiency and optimization? What if every law of physics is just a rule in a cosmic game engine?

And if so... who wrote the code?

Is it aliens? A super-intelligent civilization? Or maybe even a future version of ourselves running simulations of the past?

A Universe Full of Mystery

Whether or not you believe in the simulation theory, there’s no denying it’s a fascinating idea. It forces us to look at the world with fresh eyes and question what we think we know about reality.

Maybe we are just players in a game, maybe not. But even if we are, that doesn’t make our experiences less real or meaningful. After all, even in a game, your choices matter — and your journey is still yours.

So the next time you look up at the stars and feel small, just remember: you might be part of the most complex simulation ever designed — and that’s pretty awesome.

Gulir ke atas untuk lanjut membaca

Link nonton film terbaru pilihan kami